Religious Fundamentalism, Parochial Altruism, and Prosocial Consumer Behavior in The Context of Inter-Religious Group A Conceptual Paper
Bilah Samping Artikel
Isi Artikel Utama
Abstrak
This conceptual paper explores the complex relationship between religious fundamentalism, parochial altruism, and inter-religious prosocial consumer behavior. It argues that social norms can significantly influence prosocial consumer behavior across religious boundaries, fostering inclusive and tolerant societal behaviors. However, this positive impact is often challenged by religious fundamentalism and parochial altruism, which tend to promote ingroup favoritism and outgroup discrimination. The paper proposes that strong religious conservatism can diminish the likelihood of helping individuals from different religious groups, while parochial altruism exacerbates this bias. To counteract these negative influences, organizations and governments must promote harmonious inter-religious interactions through strategic efforts. Such initiatives can contribute to a more inclusive and harmonious society. This study contributes to the broader understanding of inter-religious dynamics and offers theoretical insights for fostering social cohesion and prosocial consumer behavior in diverse communities.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.displayStats.downloads##
Rincian Artikel
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Referensi
Abdullah, M., & Sapiei, N. S. (2018). Do religiosity, gender and educational background influence zakat compliance? The case of Malaysia. International Journal of Social Economics, 45(8), 1250–1264. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-03-2017-0091
Aji, H. M., Albari, A., Muthohar, M., Sumadi, S., Sigit, M., Muslichah, I., & Hidayat, A. (2021). Investigating the determinants of online infaq intention during the COVID-19 pandemic: an insight from Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 12(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-05-2020-0136
Aji, H. M., & Muslichah, I. (2022). Online Cross-Religion Donation During Covid-19: Mediating Role of Empathy & Trust. Journal of Islamic Marketing, Forthcomin. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-09-2021-0316
Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.
Akram, M., Nasar, A., & Rehman, A. (2021). Misuse of charitable giving to finance violent extremism; A futuristic actions study amidst COVID-19 pandemic. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 4(1), 100140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100140
Al-Qardawi, Y. (2009). Fiqh Al Zakah (Volume II): A Comparative Study of Zakah, Regulations and Philosophy in The Light of Qur’an and Sunnah. In M. Kahf (Ed.), Fiqh Al Zakah (Volume II). Scientific Publishing Center, King Abdulaziz University.
Allport, G. W. (1966). The Religious Context of Prejudice. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 5(3), 447–457.
Altemeyer, B., & Hunsberger, B. (1992). Authoritarianism , Religious Fundamentalism, Quest , and Prejudice. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 2(2), 113–133. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327582ijpr0202
Altemeyer, B., & Hunsberger, B. (2009). A Revised Religious Fundamentalism Scale : The Short and Sweet of It A Revised Religious Fundamentalism Scale : The Short and Sweet of It. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion RESEARCH, 14(November 2014), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327582ijpr1401
Andam, A. ., & Osman, A. . (2019). Determinants of intention to give zakat on employment income. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 10(4), 528–545. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-08-2016-0097
Atika, S. (2020, June 28). Neighbors look after one another to combat COVID-19 in Central Java. The Jakarta Post. https://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2020/06/28/neighbors-look-after-one-another-to-combat-covid-19-in-central-java.html
Batson, C. D., Oleson, K. C., Weeks, J. L., Healy, S. P., Reeves, P. J., Jennings, P., & Brown, T. (1989). Religious Prosocial Motivation: Is It Altruistic or Egoistic? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(5), 873–884. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.873
Blogowska, J., & Saroglou, V. (2011). Religious Fundamentalism and Limited Prosociality as a Function of the Target. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 50(1), 44–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5906.2010.01551.x
Borinca, I., Andrighetto, L., Valsecchi, G., & Berent, J. (2021). Ingroup norms shape understanding of outgroup prosocial behaviors. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220987604
Brewer, M. B. (1997). The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations: Can Research Inform Practice? Journal of Social Issues, 53(1), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1997.tb02440.x
Brown, S., & Taylor, K. (2019). Charitable Behaviour and Political Ideology: Evidence for the UK. Working Papers, 2019002. https://ideas.repec.org/p/shf/wpaper/2019002.html
Burchell, K., Rettie, R., & Patel, K. (2013). Marketing social norms: Social marketing and the ‘social norm approach.’ Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 12, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb
Butt, S. (2018). Religious conservatism, Islamic criminal law and the judiciary in Indonesia: a tale of three courts. Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 50(3), 402–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2018.1532025
CAF. (2021). CAF WORLD GIVING INDEX 2021 A global pandemic special report. www.cafonline.org
Čapienė, A., Rūtelionė, A., & Krukowski, K. (2022). Engaging in Sustainable Consumption: Exploring the Influence of Environmental Attitudes, Values, Personal Norms, and Perceived Responsibility. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610290
Carlo, G., & Randall, B. A. (2002). The development of a measure of prosocial behaviors for late adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014033032440
Chen, Y., Wang, Z., Zhang, Q., Dong, W., Xu, J. H. C., Wu, S. J., Zhang, X., & Chen, C. (2022). Compassion, Discrimination, and Prosocial Behaviors: Young Diasporic Chinese During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(February), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.814869
Chiang, Y. S., & Wu, C. I. (2015). Social influence and the adaptation of parochial altruism: A dictator-game experiment on children and adolescents under peer influence. Evolution and Human Behavior, 36(6), 430–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2015.03.007
Collins, J. (2013). A study of religiosity and conservatismin relation to social value orientation and philanthropy. Modern Psychological Studies, 18(2), 10.
Costenbader, E., Cislaghi, B., Clark, C. J., Hinson, L., Lenzi, R., McCarraher, D. R., McLarnon-Silk, C., Pulerwitz, J., Shaw, B., & Stefanik, L. (2019). Social Norms Measurement: Catching up With Programs and Moving the Field Forward. Journal of Adolescent Health, 64(4), S4–S6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.01.001
Dauda, K. . (2020). Islamophobia and religious intolerance: Threats to global peace and harmonious co-existence. Qudus International Journal of Islamic Studies (QIJIS), 8(2), 257–292.
Eckstein, S. (2001). Community as Gift-Giving : Collectivistic Roots of Volunteerism. American Sociological Review, 66(6), 829–851.
Emerson, M. O., & Hartman, D. (2006). The rise of religious fundamentalism. Annual Review of Sociology, 32, 127–144. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.32.061604.123141
Farmer, A., Kidwell, B., & Hardesty, D. M. (2020). Helping a Few a Lot or Many a Little: Political Ideology and Charitable Giving. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 30(4), 614–630. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1164
Galen, L. W., Sharp, M., & McNulty, A. (2015). Nonreligious Group Factors Versus Religious Belief in the Prediction of Prosociality. Social Indicators Research, 122(2), 411–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0700-0
Gotowiec, S., & Mastrigt, S. Van. (2019). Having versus doing : The roles of moral identity internalization and symbolization for prosocial behaviors and symbolization for prosocial behaviors. The Journal of Social Psychology, 159(1), 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2018.1454394
Hopkins, N., Reicher, S., Harrison, K., Cassidy, C., Bull, R., & Levine, M. (2007). Helping to improve the group stereotype: On the strategic dimension of prosocial behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(6), 776–788. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207301023
Hur, M. Y. (2006). Exploring the motivation factors of charitable giving and their value structure: A case study of Seoul, Korea. Social Behavior and Personality, 34(6), 661–680. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2006.34.6.661
Isler, O., Yilmaz, O., & John Maule, A. (2021). Religion, parochialism and intuitive cooperation. Nature Human Behaviour, 5(4), 512–521. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-01014-3
Ivanec, P. ., Biruški, C. ., & Pehar, L. (2021). Effects of intergroup contact norms and school climate on youth self-reported outgroup prosocial behaviour in school. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01714-7
Jamal, A., Yaccob, A., Bartikowski, B., & Slater, S. (2019). Motivations to donate: Exploring the role of religiousness in charitable donations. Journal of Business Research, 103, 319–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.01.064
Jost, J. T. (2017). The marketplace of ideology: “Elective affinities” in political psychology and their implications for consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27(4), 502–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2017.07.003
Jost, J. T., Napier, J. L., Thorisdottir, H., Gosling, S. D., Palfai, T. P., & Ostafin, B. (2007). Are needs to manage uncertainty and threat associated with political conservatism or ideological extremity? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(7), 989–1007. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207301028
Kanekar, S., & Merchant, S. M. (2001). Helping norms in relation to religious affiliation. Journal of Social Psychology, 141(5), 617–626. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224540109600575
Kashif, M., Sarifuddin, S., & Hassan, A. (2015). Charity donation: Intentions and behavior. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 33(1), 90–102. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-07-2013-0110
KemenPPN/Bappenas. (2024). Indonesia Emas 2045. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1JSZp1Oz37KWktxi-hi0okVXxEsKuaU-I/view
Kim, Y. (2021). Politics, religion, and tax incentives for charitable giving in south korea*. Korean Economic Review, 37(1), 141–155. https://doi.org/10.22841/kerdoi.2021.37.1.006
Koopmans, R., & Rebers, S. (2009). Collective action in culturally similar and dissimilar groups: an experiment on parochialism, conditional cooperation, and their linkages. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30(3), 201–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.01.003
Manzur, E., & Olavarrieta, S. (2021). The 9-SRA scale: A simplified 9-items version of the SRA scale to assess altruism. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13136999
McKeown, S., & Taylor, L. K. (2018). Perceived peer and school norm effects on youth antisocial and prosocial behaviours through intergroup contact in Northern Ireland. British Journal of Social Psychology, 57(3), 652–665. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12257
Meleady, R., & Seger, C. R. (2017). Imagined contact encourages prosocial behavior towards outgroup members. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 20(4), 447–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430215612225
Meuwese, R., Cillessen, A. H. N., & Güroğlu, B. (2017). Friends in high places: A dyadic perspective on peer status as predictor of friendship quality and the mediating role of empathy and prosocial behavior. Social Development, 26(3), 503–519. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12213
Miles, E., & Crisp, R. J. (2014). A meta-analytic test of the imagined contact hypothesis. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 17(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430213510573
Murillo, D. E. C., Kang, J., & Yoon, S. (2016). Factors influencing pro-social consumer behavior through non-profit organizations. Internet Research, 26(3), 626–643. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-10-2014-0253
Neilson, L. . (2010). Boycott or buycott? Understanding political consumerism. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 9, 214–227. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.313
Oyserman, D., & Schwarz, N. (2017). Conservatism as a situated identity: Implications for consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27(4), 532–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2017.08.003
Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751–783. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751
Qardawi, Y. Al. (2000). Fiqh Al Zakah: A Comparative Study Of Zakah, Regulations And Philosophy In The Light Of Qur’an And Sunnah. Fiqh Al Zakah (Volume I), 1–351.
Ranganathan, S. K., & Henley, W. H. (2008). Determinants of charitable donation intentions: a structural equation model. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 13(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.297
Rudert, S. C., & Janke, S. (2021). Following the crowd in times of crisis: Descriptive norms predict physical distancing, stockpiling, and prosocial behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302211023562
Rushton, J. P., Chrisjohn, R. D., & Fekken, G. C. (1981). The altruistic personality and the self-report altruism scale. Personality and Individual Differences. Personality and Individual Differences, 2(4), 293–302.
Saad, R. A. J., & Haniffa, R. (2014). Determinants of zakah ( Islamic tax ) compliance behavior. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 5(2), 182–193. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-10-2012-0068
Shang, J., Reed, A., & Croson, R. (2008). Identity congruency effects on donations. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(3), 351–361. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.45.3.351
Shin, H. (2017). Friendship Dynamics of Adolescent Aggression, Prosocial Behavior, and Social Status: The Moderating Role of Gender. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(11), 2305–2320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0702-8
Shin, S., & Yoon, S. W. (2018). Consumer motivation for the decision to boycott: The social dilemma. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 42(4), 439–447. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12444
Small, D. A., & Cryder, C. (2016). Prosocial consumer behavior. Current Opinion in Psychology, 10, 107–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.01.001
Sugirtharajah, S. (2001, September 1). Traditions of giving in Hinduism . https://www.alliancemagazine.org/feature/traditions-of-giving-in-hinduism/
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. . (2004). The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. In J. . Jost & J. Sidanius (Eds.), Key Readings in Social Psychology: Political Psychology (pp. 367–390). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139175043.002
Taylor, L. K., Merrilees, C. E., Goeke-Morey, M. C., Shirlow, P., Cairns, E., & Mark Cummings, E. (2014). Political violence and adolescent out-group attitudes and prosocial behaviors: Implications for positive inter-group relations. Social Development, 23(4), 840–859. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12074
Usslepp, T., Awanis, S., Hogg, M. K., & Daryanto, A. (2021). The Inhibitory Effect of Political Conservatism on Consumption: The Case of Fair Trade. Journal of Business Ethics, Lmic. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04689-w
Vaidyanathan, B., Hill, J. P., & Smith, C. (2011). Religion and Charitable Financial Giving to Religious and Secular Causes: Does Political Ideology Matter? Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 50(3), 450–469. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5906.2011.01584.x
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.
Verhaert, G. A., & Van den Poel, D. (2011). Empathy as added value in predicting donation behavior. Journal of Business Research, 64(12), 1288–1295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.12.024
Vermue, M., Meleady, R., & Seger, C. R. (2019). Member-to-member generalisation in trust behaviour: How do prior experiences inform prosocial behaviour towards novel ingroup and outgroup members? Current Psychology, 38(4), 1003–1020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00289-8
Wang, L., & Graddy, E. (2008). Social capital, volunteering, and charitable giving. Voluntas, 19(1), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-008-9055-y
Wang, Y. (2014). Individualism / collectivism , charitable giving , and cause-related marketing : a comparison of Chinese and Americans. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 19(February), 40–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.1486
White, K., Habib, R., & Dahl, D. W. (2020). A review and framework for thinking about the drivers of prosocial consumer behavior. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 5(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1086/706782
Willard, A. K. (2018). Religion and prosocial behavior among the Indo-Fijians. Religion, Brain and Behavior, 8(2), 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2016.1267032
Wilson, G. ., & Patterson, J. . (1968). A New Measure of Conservatism. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 7(4), 264–269. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8260.1968.tb00568.x
Winterich, K. P., Mittal, V., & Aquino, K. (2013). When does recognition increase charitable behavior? Toward a moral identity-based model. Journal of Marketing, 77(3), 121–134. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.11.0477
Winterich, K. P., & Zhang, Y. (2014). Accepting inequality deters responsibility: How power distance decreases charitable behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(2), 274–293. https://doi.org/10.1086/675927
Yue, Z., & Yang, J. Z. (2021). Compassionate goals, prosocial emotions, and prosocial behaviours during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, November, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2507