Generation Z's Expectations for Well-being in the Workplace: The Role of Work Meaningfulness and Gender Factors

Main Article Content

Maisaroh

Abstract

This study investigates how Gen-Z envisions well-being in the workplace, particularly within the framework of sustainable work environments. Using the PERMA model, which encompasses Positive Emotion, Engagement, Relationships, Meaning, and Accomplishment, as the guiding theory, the research examines whether these five dimensions effectively capture Gen Z’s expectations for future workplace well-being. Besides that, the research also examines the relationship between work meaningfulness and well-being, moderated by the gender factor. Data were gathered from 454 university students in Indonesia.  through a structured questionnaire and analyzed using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and SEM PLS. Interestingly, rather than emerging as five distinct dimensions, the PERMA items loaded onto two dimensions named Hedonic and Eudaimonic Well-being. This suggests that Gen-Z views workplace well-being from both a short and long-term perspective. Research also found that work meaningfulness positively impacts well-being, but gender does not moderate that relationship. The findings may also reflect a broader cultural inclination toward relational connectedness and shared meaning when assessing well-being. Besides that, the research also found that work meaningfulness positively impacts well-being on students, but gender does not moderate that relationship. By offering these insights, the study contributes to higher education institutions, career guidance service providers, and curriculum designers in developing self-development and career readiness programs that not only emphasize improving short-term happiness aspects (hedonic), but also prioritize strengthening meaning, engagement, and sustainable achievement (eudaimonic).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Al-Hendawi, M., Alodat, A., Al-Zoubi, S., & Bulut, S. (2024). A PERMA model approach to well-being: a psychometric properties study. BMC Psychology, 12(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-01909-0

Allan, B. A., Batz-Barbarich, C., Sterling, H. M., & Tay, L. (2019). Outcomes of Meaningfulness Work: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 56(3), 500–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12406

Allan, B. A., Dexter, C., Kinsey, R., & Parker, S. (2018). Meaningfulness work and mental health: job satisfaction as a moderator. Journal of Mental Health, 27(1), 38–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2016.1244718

Butler, J., & Kern, M. L. (2016). The PERMA-Profiler: A brief multidimensional measure of flourishing. International Journal of Wellbeing, 6(3), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v6i3.526

da Costa, S., Martínez-Moreno, E., Díaz, V., Hermosilla, D., Amutio, A., Padoan, S., Méndez, D., Etchebehere, G., Torres, A., Telletxea, S., & García-Mazzieri, S. (2020). Belonging and Social Integration as Factors of Well-Being in Latin America and Latin Europe Organizations. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(December). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.604412

Deloitte. (2023). 2023 Gen Z and Millennial Survey. Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, 1–37. https://www.deloitte.com/global/en/issues/work/content/genzmillennialsurvey.html

Fischer, I., & Luiz, J. M. (2024). Exploring gender differences in Gen Z students’ attribution of obstacles influencing their academic and professional success. International Journal of Management Education, 22(2), 100989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2024.100989

Goodman, F. R., Disabato, D. J., Kashdan, T. B., & Kauffman, S. B. (2018). Measuring well-being: A comparison of subjective well-being and PERMA. Journal of Positive Psychology, 13(4), 321–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2017.1388434

Grosz, M. P., Schwartz, S. H., & Lechner, C. M. (2021). The longitudinal interplay between personal values and subjective well-being: A registered report. European Journal of Personality, 35(6), 881–897. https://doi.org/10.1177/08902070211012923

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., & Ringle, C. M. (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling ( PLS-SEM ).

Herr, R. M., Brokmeier, L., Baron, B. N., Mauss, D., & Fischer, J. E. (2023). The longitudinal directional associations of meaningfulness work with mental well-being – initial findings from an exploratory investigation. BMC Psychology, 11(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01308-x

Kennedy, E. H., & Dzialo, L. (2015). Locating Gender in Environmental Sociology. Sociology Compass, 9(10), 920–929. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12303

Kern, M. L., Waters, L. E., Adler, A., & White, M. A. (2015). A multidimensional approach to measuring well-being in students: Application of the PERMA framework. Journal of Positive Psychology, 10(3), 262–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2014.936962

Kompasiana. (2024). Optimalisasi Retensi Karyawan: Strategi Menghadapi Turnover Intention Generasi Z. https://www.kompasiana.com/listiroh/666ba882c925c43e7910e028/optimalisasi-retensi-karyawan-strategi-menghadapi-turnover-intention-generasi-z

Linton, M. J., Dieppe, P., & Medina-Lara, A. (2016). Review of 99 self-report measures for assessing well-being in adults: Exploring dimensions of well-being and developments over time. BMJ Open, 6(7). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010641

Lips-Wiersma, M., Haar, J., & Cooper–Thomas, H. D. (2023). Is meaningfulness work always a resource toward wellbeing? The effect of autonomy, security and multiple dimensions of subjective meaningfulness work on wellbeing. Personnel Review, 52(1), 321–341. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-10-2020-0754

Maloni, M., Hiatt, M. S., & Campbell, S. (2019). Understanding the work values of Gen Z business students. International Journal of Management Education, 17(3), 100320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2019.100320

Matud, M. P., Bethencourth, J. M., Ibáñez, I., & Fortes, D. (2020). Gender and psychological well-being in older adults. International Psychogeriatrics, 32(11), 1293–1302. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610220000824

Matud, M. P., López-Curbelo, M., & Fortes, D. (2019). Gender and psychological well-being. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(19), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16193531

Odrowaz-Coates, A. (2021). Definitions of sustainability in the context of gender. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126862

OECD. (2021). COVID-19 and Well-being. In COVID-19 and Well-being. https://doi.org/10.1787/1e1ecb53-en

Olsson, D., & Gericke, N. (2017). The effect of gender on students’ sustainability consciousness: A nationwide Swedish study. Journal of Environmental Education, 48(5), 357–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2017.1310083

Ruggeri K, Garcia-Garzon E, Maguire Á, Matz S, & Huppert F. (2020). Well-being is more than happiness and life satisfaction: A multidimensional analysis of 21 countries. Health and Quality of Life OutcomesHealth and Quality of Life Outcomes [revista en Internet] 2020 [acceso 4 de julio de 2021]; 18(1): 1-16. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 1–16. https://hqlo.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/s12955-020-01423-y.pdf

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141

Ryff, C. D., Boylan, J. M., & Kirsch, J. A. (2021). Eudaimonic and Hedonic Well-Being. In Measuring Well-Being. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197512531.003.0005

Salvadorinho, J., Hines, P., Kumar, M., Ferreira, C., & Teixeira, L. (2024). Empowering Generation Z in manufacturing organizations: a 6-factor self-determination extension. Journal of Work-Applied Management, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWAM-07-2024-0087

Seligman, M. E. (2011). Flourish: A new understanding of happiness, well-being-and how to achieve them. Simon and Schuster.

Sharabi, M. (2017). The meaning of work dimensions according to organizational status: does gender matter? Employee Relations, 39(5), 643–659. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-04-2016-0087

Silva, J., & Carvalho, A. (2021). The work values of portuguese generation z in the higher education-to-work transition phase. Social Sciences, 10(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci10080297

Soren, A., & Ryff, C. D. (2023). Meaningfulness Work, Well-Being, and Health: Enacting a Eudaimonic Vision. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20166570

Steger, M. F., Dik, B. J., & Duffy, R. D. (2012). Measuring Meaningfulness Work: The Work and Meaning Inventory (WAMI). Journal of Career Assessment, 20(3), 322–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072711436160

WHO. (2022). Gender and Health. https://www.who.int/health-topics/gender#tab=tab_1

Zhang, W., Balloo, K., Hosein, A., & Medland, E. (2024). A scoping review of well-being measures: conceptualisation and scales for overall well-being. BMC Psychology, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-02074-0